July 15, 2003


-sigh- North Korea -sigh-

Former Defense Secretary William Perry has spoken, and it's not about Easter Bunnies and Santa Claus. He spoke about a small southeast Asian problem. Called North Korea. In making his stupid Axis of Evil speech, Presdent Quien-Es-Mas-Macho drew the North Koreans into a box. Feeling (and being)far more economically disadvantaged than say Iran, the NK's started to re-develop the one true ecomomic asset they have. Real Weapons of Mass Destruction. Now it's starting to look like they may want to use them, whether as high-atomic weight fund-raising tools or perhaps WEAPONS.

Former defense secretary William Perry warned that the United States and North Korea are drifting toward war, perhaps as early as this year, in an increasingly dangerous standoff that also could result in terrorists being able to purchase a North Korean nuclear device and plant it in a U.S. city.

"I think we are losing control" of the situation, said Perry, who believes North Korea soon will have enough nuclear warheads to begin exploding them in tests and exporting them to terrorists and other U.S. adversaries. "The nuclear program now underway in North Korea poses an imminent danger of nuclear weapons being detonated in American cities," he said in an interview.

Get that part?
"The nuclear program now underway in North Korea poses an imminent danger of nuclear weapons being detonated in American cities,"
So as the casualties mount in Iraq, (today marks the day we have one combat casualty less than Gulf War I, and it continues); the 3rd Infantry Division has been told, "no orders home to the world, troops" after being told that they would be home this year (2x, I believe); and other international commitments and challenges for our nation are on the horizon. It's a bad deal, and not being made any better by the 1600 Crew's failure to even think beyond electoral politics in all things Foreign, Domestic and Military.

Fred Kaplan writing in Slate today sums up all the bad choices that the 1600 Crew has made and distilled it down to the one that might work. Talk to the NK's and begin to offer reasonable, humantiarian aide.

So, unless Bush prefers a nuclear North Korea to the pangs of compromise, he is left with one course—a negotiated buy-out. Kim has been requesting such a buy-out ever since the crisis started last October, and if Bush can see beyond the cliché of tagging all such schemes as "blackmail" or "appeasement"—if his advisers could remind him that all diplomacy (especially nuclear diplomacy) involves a certain amount of bribery—there may be a chance to stop this wreck before it happens.

Essentially, Kim's minions say he will abandon his nuclear program and open up the reactors to inspection, in exchange for a U.S. non-aggression pact and the resumption of some economic assistance. This isn't a bad deal, really. A bipartisan group of congressmen who went to Pyongyang last month put a 10-point plan on the table, outlining a way to achieve these ends. The minions said they liked it. No one has explained why Bush shouldn't adopt the plan as his and start the talks.

Obviously, some administration officials think he should go for a negotiated solution. That's why they leaked Plan 5030—to highlight how closely this crisis might veer to war. Kim Jong-il thinks we're going to attack him, so he rushes his nuclear-weapons program to deter the onslaught—which incites Pentagon officials to drum up better plans to attack him. The alarming question before us all: Will Bush break this deadly circle, or complete it?

But, as in Iraq, I'm sure that God, whether he has appeared to this sad excuse for a president as a piece of Snack Food or a K-street lobbyist has told him to not treat with the godless-commies on the Korean Penninsula.

And that scares me.

posted by Jo Fish on 07.15.03 at 10:37 AM





Comments:

Unfortunately, perpetual war is something like rule #3 or #4 in the neocon handbook. The only ways Bush will be likely to avoid military conflict with NK are if Congress does their job and refuses to authorize it, or if his handlers judge that it's not politically expedient for him right now to have war on 3 or 4 fronts while running for reelection.

posted by: Nurse Ratched on 07.15.03 at 10:46 AM [permalink]



Is potential conflict with North Korea factored into the 2004 campaign? Will "timely" military action result in a second term? Will the patriotic rabbit be pulled from the hat?

posted by: Shag from Brookline on 07.15.03 at 04:48 PM [permalink]



According to Dubya's record we'll be invading N. Korea in Sept or Oct 2004. This will work out great in my neck of the woods( where there is an odd coalition among redneck republicans and country club repukes)the Bush/Cheney stickers on the Mercedes SUV's and old Chevey pick-ups can also serve as radiation detectors.
I'm not a pacifist, N.Korea poses a threat to world peace. Too bad Bushwacher and Co. didn't take on the really bad guys and put Iraq on the back burner. Now the military is spread too thin and he's weakened our bargaining position. Why the press constantly reminds us that the Repukes are the party with the edge on foreign policy is at least good for a laugh.

posted by: Rudie on 07.15.03 at 06:39 PM [permalink]



Minor point. North Korea is in Northeast Asia.

posted by: jayliv on 07.15.03 at 06:42 PM [permalink]



Having spent an obligatory year at Camp Red Cloud some 30-odd years ago, I have managed to remain current on what goes on in Korea. I wish I could say the same for this administration. Are they really prepared for what will happen when NK tests their bomb? Or will they be caught short again like they were last October?

posted by: Preston on 07.16.03 at 03:53 PM [permalink]



Let's pay everyone to not hurt us. I did the same thing when I saw the school bully take my friends milk money. I volunteered my money to him to avoid conflict, now I am a grown coward such as yourself.

posted by: Earl on 01.10.04 at 09:33 AM [permalink]



We are healthy only to the extent that our ideas are humane.

posted by: Brooks Dana on 05.03.04 at 05:25 AM [permalink]






Post a Comment:

Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember your info?



















usdemvet -at- hotmail.com
or
usndemvet -at- usdemvet.com (coming soon)






All the original material © 2002-2003 Jo Fish
steal what you want, all I ask is an attribution of some sort
Thanks