August 20, 2003


Better and Better in Baghdad

From the Obvious Understatement Department: The situation on the ground in Iraq isn't getting any better.

So what's the deal? Seems that there were foreign jihadis involved in the latest vehicle-based bombing (car or truck...vehicle works for me), in Baghdad. I guess that the "flys" are coming home to see what's up in scenic Iraq, and perhaps leave a little death and destruction behind. Meanwhile, the air conditioning works in Crawford, on Barbados and I'm pretty sure it's still on in Auntie Donny's office in the E-ring.

Reports available so far on the truck-bomb explosion at a building housing the United Nations offices in Baghdad on Tuesday indicate that it was probably the work of foreign jihadi elements, with some local complicity.
...
The jihadi and other resistance elements have been saying that just as the jihad of the 1980s in Afghanistan brought about the collapse of one superpower (the Soviet Union), the present jihad in Iraq, which, according to them, is being waged in tandem with that in Afghanistan, will bring about the end of the other superpower (the United States). They claim to have already trapped the US troops in Iraq and do not want any other nation to come to the rescue of the Americans, as they want to bleed them to death.
...
Lesson 11: Bush should make an indirect signal to the Iraqi people that he realizes that serious policy mistakes have been made and he is taking action to correct them. It is not necessary to make an open mea culpa in this regard.
The other "ten lessons" are worth a read. Keep in mind that the author of the quote speaks with some authority about the mindset of the folks in that part of the world; he's a retired Indian Cabinet minister.

The only flaw in his logic is that President Dry-Drunk never admits he is wrong...about anything. So getting the 1600 Crew to admit that there is a serious policy mistake, is to first get them to admit there is/was a policy and then say those magic words: We Wuz Wrong.

Not betting the ranch on that happening.

posted by Jo Fish on 08.20.03 at 09:01 PM





Comments:

Nope. No way are we betting the ranch-- especially as, having bought it in 1999 to look more "Texan", we've barely owned it four years!!!

posted by: the talking dog on 08.20.03 at 10:09 PM [permalink]



We can only hope and pray that Bush will be gone in 2004 and the troops will be home. Oh yea,and that every radical Muslim nutcase in the world drinks a can of Draino and goes to live in that virgin filled palace in the sky, so we can all start to live in relative peace.

posted by: bean bag on 08.20.03 at 11:45 PM [permalink]



W has indeed created a quagmire for his successor, whether in 2004 or 2008. If a Democrat President comes in 2004, she will have to address serious growing deficits at home in addition to even more serious international issues. Guys like Pat Buchanan will again surface, with isolationism on their minds. Globalization will go down the drain. If W prevails in 2004, he will be a lame duck and even less effective than presently, as deficits will continue to grow and the economy to decline, with the world more chaotic. By 2008, it may be too late, although it might serve Democrats for several terms. But what will it be worth. It is better to aim for 2004 with realistic efforts by Democrats to undo W's follies; we may have to do a lot of belt tightening. Consider how long, and how, it took to recover from the Great Depression. I'd be depressed if I wasn't beyond three score and ten years. The younger generations must get angry - for their own survival.

posted by: Shag from Brookline on 08.21.03 at 07:00 AM [permalink]






Post a Comment:

Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember your info?



















usdemvet -at- hotmail.com
or
usndemvet -at- usdemvet.com (coming soon)






All the original material © 2002-2003 Jo Fish
steal what you want, all I ask is an attribution of some sort
Thanks