Calling the Chimp on policy...a major paper? No, really
Is the SCLM finally starting to waken at its periphery? Here's a column from the Chicago Trib (login: gorevidal/gorevidal) that actually raises the bullshit flag on the 1600 Crews policy in Iraq, and names names, Douglas Feith you recalcitrant neocon warmonger you, hanging with Manucher Ghorbanifar of Iran-Contra fame...
First, it is generally accepted (except by the war's avid authorities) that the reasons for invading Iraq were false. Second, the war party around the White House and the Pentagon are responding to their incredible failures of judgment not by modifying their policies in the Middle East, but by doing more and still more of the same.
...
The joke around town is that the Bush zealots had all along been scheming to attack Iraq to get all the terrorists in the world to pour in there--to get them all in one place.
Meanwhile, the administration is unwilling to take actions that could ameliorate the situation--such as putting forth a UN resolution that would share the military and reconstruction burdens in Iraq. Part of the reason is their zealotry, carefully clothed in the fancy dress of "democratization"--and part of it is that neither they nor their friends or children are actually fighting or suffering in this war.
...
Officials from the civilian Pentagon offices of Undersecretary of Defense Douglas Feith, the man most responsible for the failures of reconstruction in Iraq, recently met surreptitiously with Manucher Ghorbanifar, the Iranian middleman in U.S. arms-for-hostage trades to Iran in the mid-1980s, in Europe. The reappearance of the discredited Iranian arms dealer clearly indicates how conspiratorial the Iraqi war is becoming.
...
Perhaps the only hope lies in the story going around town that President Bush has told the Pentagon he wants "no more American dead" after next March. By then, the electoral campaign will be well under way, and perhaps zealotry will give way to reality--or at least to a change in administration.
I still want to know what's up with that quote "no more American dead". After next March...what happens on April Fool's Day 2004, do all the dead kids get up and come home? Or is that yet another invitation from President Zucchini-Crotch to the pissed-off factions in Iraq to engage in a pre-April Fool's Day orgy of killing to make a point? I mean what kind of moron makes that kind of statement? The kind that fly out to carriers and declare "Mission Accomplished" in a campaign 2004 photo-op perhaps. Twit.
posted by Jo Fish on 08.31.03 at 01:55 AM
Comments:
So W's Iraq attack is actually a sting operation - to attract all the terrorists to come to Iraq like moths to a flame - and then zap them. I wonder if there is a patent pending.
How would W punish those who violate his executive order of no dead after March 2004?
posted by: Shag from Brookline on 08.31.03 at 07:28 AM [permalink]
How about 'no more American dead after September 1, 2003'? This is a man who loves sending people to their death. Scores of dead as governor of Texas, now thousands as President. How does he sleep at night?
posted by: cat on 09.01.03 at 08:00 AM [permalink]