September 21, 2003


Keep an eye on this one...

In a rotten economy there will always be a pretty fair number of folks who will look to the military for a job, when they might not have otherwise considered it. Military service is not a bad thing, and I see the folks who are considering it as people who will eventually learn that there is a greater world beyond the borders of their hometown. The service can ultimately be a great equalizer.

The services are set to meet their goals for this fiscal year. Which given the situation in Iraq may or may not be a good thing for the Army and the National Guard. But right now all the service chiefs are trumpeting thier respective goal-filling success, and it all looks wonderful 'til you read this:

...Next month it (the Army -JF) is rolling out a 15-month enlistment option (the current minimum length for a tour is two years) aimed at college students, an increasingly important target group.
...
Under a program started two months ago, the Army has raised its age limit for new recruits to 40 years old from 34, ...
Yeah, I call that thinking ahead. Did anyone ask about how many waivers they will be granting for petty crimes, drug offenses and such? Be very interesting to see how this plays out over the next few years. Oh, and the reduction of the minimum initial obligation from 24 to 15 months thing...nope, they anticipate no troubles in the future, my substantial gluteous maximus.

posted by Jo Fish on 09.21.03 at 11:58 PM





Comments:

So it takes a real bad economy to recruit young men and woman to join the military who otherwise might not get employment. Part of this real bad economy, a significant part, is the Iraq conflict. Are we in for another lost generation?

posted by: Shag from Brookline on 09.22.03 at 01:50 PM [permalink]



A fifteen-month obligation?

Three months for boot camp, more or less, leaves one year for actual useful service, not counting occupational school. These people will be getting out right when they've just begun being useful. Because they're sure as hell not going to use up school quotas and funding with early-out bodies.

Unless: Enlist for fifteen months, be put into a cannon-fodder MOS, and watch that stop-loss order keep you in for as long as we want, contract be damned. Now, that makes sense, and it's just the sort of thing the Mayberry Machiavellis would pull.

They really do think we're retarded, don't they?

posted by: Anymouse on 09.22.03 at 02:46 PM [permalink]



Upping the enlistment age, that's pretty scary too. Hell, I'm almost 38 and would drop dead after three days of boot.

posted by: the mullet on 09.22.03 at 11:27 PM [permalink]



The thing to keep in mind when dealing with military recruiters, is what they don't tell you. Like your service can (will) be extended beyond the original 15-month contract.
Or that you won't have any choice of duty station.
Or choice of MOS.
Or that they can send you to a camp in Minnesota in January to shrink your butt quickly.
It still beats the draft.
Draft Clark? He's a political mercenary unfit to scrub a latrine at Grafenwohr, or the Baghdad Airport.

posted by: Ted on 09.23.03 at 09:26 PM [permalink]



"You are paid to stop a bullet." It's a soldier's job, they say. And then you stop the bullet. And then they stop your pay. Anyone so ignorant that they don't understand the above when they sign up should be taken out of the gene pool.

posted by: T.G. Fisher on 03.25.04 at 12:17 PM [permalink]






Post a Comment:

Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember your info?



















usdemvet -at- hotmail.com
or
usndemvet -at- usdemvet.com (coming soon)






All the original material © 2002-2003 Jo Fish
steal what you want, all I ask is an attribution of some sort
Thanks