Is there something just wrong with this headline from the NY Times?
Bush Orders Full Cooperation in Leaking of Name
Or is it just me?
posted by Jo Fish on 10.01.03 at 12:39 AM
Comments:
Full cooperation would include a 24 hour heads up from Holy John to the WH gremlins: "I'm coming over there sometime late tomorrow to start inventorying all your phone logs, memos, and related paperwork, because I'm looking to find out who broke the law."
Then the WH Counsel, Alberto Gonzalez, writes a memo: "The FBI will be here tomorrow, and they're going to want to look at all the paperwork in your files about this crime. Anything you've still got hanging around. Anything. If there is anything."
Borrowing a theme from another blog: were they having a bar-b-que over there at 1600 or is all that smoke because they're electing a new pope?
posted by: Lurch on 10.01.03 at 08:23 AM [permalink]
Bush can make this go away now, easily.
He can release all reporters from any confidentiality agreements they may have had with his White House staff in regard to this matter.
He hasn't.
So he must be hiding something -- which as we have seen is usually guilt about something.
posted by: Evan Allen on 10.01.03 at 10:57 AM [permalink]
Wait...we can't declare him guilty until we see the stain on his dress - I mean his shorts.
posted by: Lurch on 10.01.03 at 02:45 PM [permalink]
wouldn't that stain be on Cheney's or Rove's shorts?
