November 20, 2003


Nothing like a self-indictment

Today Richard Perle, Chickenhawk investment guru and unfortunate afterbirth of some mammalian creature said this:

In a startling break with the official White House and Downing Street lines, Mr Perle told an audience in London: "I think in this case international law stood in the way of doing the right thing."

President George Bush has consistently argued that the war was legal either because of existing UN security council resolutions on Iraq - also the British government's publicly stated view - or as an act of self-defence permitted by international law.

But Mr Perle, a key member of the defence policy board, which advises the US defence secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, said that "international law ... would have required us to leave Saddam Hussein alone", and this would have been morally unacceptable.

As much as it pains me to bring this up, here's a little something that speaks to the presidential War Criminal-in-Chief and all the members of the 1600 Crew
COUNT ONE -- THE COMMON PLAN OR CONSPIRACY

(Charter, Article 6, especially 6 (a))

III. Statement of the Offense

All the defendants, with divers other persons, during a period of years preceding 8th May, 1945, participated as leaders, organizers, instigators or accomplices in the formulation or execution of a common plan or conspiracy to commit, or which involved the commission of, Crimes against Peace, War Crimes, and Crimes against Humanity, as defined in the Charter of this Tribunal, and, in accordance with the provisions of the Charter, are individually responsible for their own acts and for all acts committed by any persons in the execution of such plan or conspiracy. The common plan or conspiracy embraced the commission of Crimes against Peace, in that the defendants planned, prepared, initiated and waged wars of aggression, which were also wars in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances.

In the development and course of the common plan or conspiracy it came to embrace the commission of War Crimes, in that it contemplated, and the defendants determined upon and carried out, ruthless wars against countries and populations, in violation of the rules and customs of war, including as typical and systematic means by which the wars were prosecuted, murder, ill-treatment, deportation for slave labor and for other purposes of civilian populations of occupied territories, murder and ill-treatment of prisoners of war and of persons on the high seas, the taking and killing of hostages, the plunder of public and private property, the wanton destruction of cities, towns, and villages, and devastation not justified by military necessity.

The common plan or conspiracy contemplated and came to embrace as typical and systematic means, and the defendants determined upon and committed, Crimes against Humanity, both within Germany and within occupied territories, including murder, extermination, enslavement deportation, and other inhumane acts committed against civilian populations before and during the war, and persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds, in execution of the plan for preparing and prosecuting aggressive or illegal wars, many of such acts and persecutions being violations of the domestic laws of the countries where perpetrated.

That's from another little dust-up last century, those are the words from the indictments at Nuremberg, speaking to the Nazis, and the havoc and destruction they caused.

The saddest part is that within the US, Perle knows that the vast majority of people who will vote republican neither know nor care what he just said. If it outrages the Europeans, so what they don't vote. It's kind of like when John D'Iulio called the 1600 Crew "Mayberry Machiavelli's" ... they were pissed, but he had already started to gravitate away from them. These statements of Perle's just ensure that the 1600 Crew will be at the very bottom of all presidencies since 1776 when viewed in a historical context, except in the minds of those who still think Ronnie Ray-gun was a studly guy.

posted by Jo Fish on 11.20.03 at 12:33 AM





Comments:

I do hope this post gets read by as many GIs in Iraq as possible. They need to know the rules.
They are, after all, responsible for their actions.

posted by: on 11.20.03 at 12:48 AM [permalink]



If there were ever someone whose external appearance reflected an inward corruption it is Richard Perle.

posted by: SOB on 11.20.03 at 06:29 AM [permalink]



I think you seem to have forgotten a basic historical reality--the winners get to make the rules....

posted by: Susie on 11.21.03 at 11:02 AM [permalink]



Susie, I hope not, because the US is a far piece from looking like a winner.

As much as I would like to see the neocons face justice, chances are the military will take the real hit on this.

posted by: Bryan on 11.21.03 at 11:26 PM [permalink]






Post a Comment:

Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember your info?



















usdemvet -at- hotmail.com
or
usndemvet -at- usdemvet.com (coming soon)






All the original material © 2002-2003 Jo Fish
steal what you want, all I ask is an attribution of some sort
Thanks