A single poll from a single pollster is just a point. More important is the trendline. And Bush's numbers over time show a steady erosion.
http://www.radiofreemonkey.com:8080/charts/img_bush_approval.gif
Absent three spikes (9/11, the fall of Baghdad, the capture of Saddam), he has shown exactly zero ability to regain routine support once he has lost it. And note that the spikes are less each time, and the declines steeper, as the rally around the flag effect wears off. This guy had three results below 50 prior to last fall, and by my count 27 since then.

Where the @*&$!# Are Kerry's Surrogates?

http://www.dems2000.net/000291.htm

Worth a read. Bush has a huge echo chamber from his own admin. plus Repukes in Congress,
wing-nut radio and the especially obnoxious morning show on Faux. I've read where progressives have a slight edge on the net, but thats it. To paraphrase Heir Karl, if it wasn't on TV it didn't happen. Kerry's big name supporters need to get in front of the cameras and fast. Warrior John's primary bounce has faded, in most polls its a dead heat with Bush pulling up. It's sickening.

retards love rertards, ergo the retard will be elected. i need another drink.

I think those numbers need some closer examination. In his performance in terrorism, Bush's approval dropped from 64-49% among Independents and 42-26% among Dems. Most people still don't know Kerry that well nor care to look--it's still so early. Expect, ahem, turd boy's numbers to fall as Kerry becomes more well known.

Kerry has to stay back, if he gets on the news bandwagon they can dismiss it as partisan, just reinforce the credibility of witnesses- Clarke, et al.

1. Timely
   
2. Strategery
   
3. Webb wins
   
4. Huh?
   
5. Bunnypants in Bagdad
   
6. Outage
   
7. Filthy Lucre Watch
   
8. Playing the numbers
   
9. My letter to Countdown
   
10. Jefferson's Nigerian Scams