April 20, 2004


Election Pandering Part One?

I'm with Tom Harkin on this one. Any time a member of the 1600 Crew publically endorses and praises anything, it's usually a death-knell for that program or idea. It seems that the 1600 Crew is now reversing course on the overtime proposals that were brought to the fore by such friends of the working man as the US Chamber of Commerce and others.

The Labor Department will allow workers who earn up to $100,000 a year to be eligible for overtime pay, a substantial shift upward from an earlier proposal that Democrats had promised to make an issue in the presidential campaign.

More low-wage workers would become automatically eligible for overtime under the final rules, due to be released today, according to Labor Department documents describing the regulation. Police, firefighters, paramedics, emergency medical technicians and licensed practical nurses will also be assured of eligibility for overtime pay if they work more than 40 hours a week.
...
"The final rule accomplishes exactly what we intended from the start, which is to preserve and protect overtime rights for white-collar workers," Chao said in a statement last night. "We are pleased to see people recognize the significant gains to workers under our final rule. Now there can be no doubt that workers win.''
...
Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), a critic of the proposed rules, said in a statement last night: "The Bush Administration simply is not trustworthy on this issue, and I am beyond skeptical about these so-called revisions. This President has gone out of his way time and again to undercut working families' right to overtime pay for overtime work. . . . The Senate will soon have the opportunity to stand up and be counted on this issue, and I look forward to the debate."
"Simply ... not trustworthy", well that about sums up the 1600 Crew in a nutshell. Let's see how far this gets before it's either "modified" on some Friday at 4:30PM when no one is watching, or the 1600 Crew gets something in under the radar as a preliminary sop to their buddies before gutting the regulations at a date to be determined. We'll be watching...

posted by Jo Fish on 04.20.04 at 12:16 AM





Comments:

I am baffled. To me this sounds like Chao gutted what the Rethugs spent substantial political capital enacting. What percentage of Americans make $100,000 plus that weren't exempt from overtime rules anyway? I know of some longshoremen and high crane operators that make this kind of money, but only by collecting huge amounts of overtime anyway. There are 2080 hours in a 40 hr week/52 week year. $100,000 represents $48/hour. Who outside Law, Medicine and Finance has $50/hour as base pay? I must be in the wrong racket.

posted by: Bruce Webb on 04.20.04 at 09:47 AM [permalink]



They [Republican administrations since at least Reagan]could see that this particular change wouldn't play well with the public.

They probably see now that if they want to make a change like this (getting rid of overtime pay and making more people salaried i.e. 'exempt'*), they have to do it much more slowly and gradually so people would think that it sounds fair.

I think their objective is to eventually change the standard to a work week that is more than 40 hours, more like 50 hours a week.

But these things must be done delicately.

*exempt is a code word for getting paid a fixed amount for as many hours as employers require.

posted by: infotainMent on 04.20.04 at 05:28 PM [permalink]



They [Republican administrations since at least Reagan]could see that this particular change wouldn't play well with the public.

They probably see now that if they want to make a change like this (getting rid of overtime pay and making more people salaried i.e. 'exempt'*), they have to do it much more slowly and gradually so people would think that it sounds fair.

I think their objective is to eventually change the standard to a work week that is more than 40 hours, more like 50 hours a week.

But these things must be done delicately.

*exempt is a code word for getting paid a fixed amount for as many hours as employers require.

posted by: infotainMent on 04.20.04 at 05:28 PM [permalink]






Post a Comment:

Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember your info?



















usdemvet -at- hotmail.com
or
usndemvet -at- usdemvet.com (coming soon)






All the original material © 2002-2003 Jo Fish
steal what you want, all I ask is an attribution of some sort
Thanks