Why, you might ask does bad science prevail in the Idiot Adminstration so prevalently?

Because ShrubCo is "faith-based". And "faith-based science" isn't science, it's religion at best and blatent fraud at worst.

Hatchery and farmed salmon are an atrocity that should not be consumed, much less counted.

This 19th century attitude that the earth can heal and Man is Destined to control Nature, so don't sweat the massive destruction and stopped worrying about melting glaciers and ice floes, is total BS. Give things time to heal and they might.

The New England fishermen who complained about over-regulation two decades ago now realize that it didn't go far enough because they are out of business.

and our great leader, preznit yale ain't shit, talks to a ghost in the clouds. maybe darwin was wrong.

My mistake, on first read I thought the name of this site was "Democratic Twelve-Year-Old".

You make the IndyMedia trolls look like they're still on their meds. It's going to be fun to come back here and crap all over you when John "That's My WIFE'S SUV" Kerry loses in a landslide.

Heh,

furious

Don't feed the nitwit trolls folks, please.

I think that one of the reasons this administration is unconcerned with gutting environmental concerns is less a case of the earth healing itself than it is of apocalyptic Christianity. The administration subscribes to a brand of Christianity that believes we are in the End Times and is more than happy to bring it about. If you read the apocalyptic visions of John, you see that famine and suffering are widespread in the End Times. To save themselves any such suffering, the Bush Regime intends to see to it that wealth is concentrated as much as possible in the hands of as few people as possible, which I think they believe will also hasten the End Times. And if we are in the End Times, who cares about a few species of fish?

Apropos of nothing, saw your Weaselly Clark quote (has he registered as a Democrat, btw), and just had to respond, and there's nowhere else to post this...

Funny Wuss-lee should say that, and that you should cite it, without mentioning the REST of the story:

"WASHINGTON — In the two weeks since retired Army general Wesley Clark entered the Democratic presidential race, Democrats have learned that Clark voted for Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan, praised President Bush and raised money for Arkansas Republicans in 2001, and is still registered as an independent in Arkansas. Some party leaders wonder whether he's Democratic enough to be their nominee."

Voted! For! Nixon! Guess he oughtta know.

Heh,

furious

kerry may very well lose in a landlide, but that won't change the fact that george bush is a drunken, illiterate, deserting cheerleader.

what does heh mean? is that a bushism?

at this point, dick nixon looks attractive compared to preznit dipshit. at least nixon could speak english, and he was a war veteran.

Yes, yes, and then the Sublime, Credentialed Intellects of the American Left realize they've been painted into a corner yet again, and there's that damn, dumb cowboy holding the brush and the bucket.

Heh. Heh.

--furious

Oh...my...god.

Shrub's former professor from B School is on Air America right now (with that awful Janeane Garofalo, who really combines all the worst stereotypes of liberals) and he is brutally honest about Dubya's mental weakness. It is so direct and honest that I thought it was parody at first, because he is basically calling him dumb, insensitive, and a liar, among other things. It is amazing. It is stunning. I wish I had started recording this. There has got to be a tape of this somewhere for you all to hear. It is fabulous.

1. Timely
   
2. Strategery
   
3. Webb wins
   
4. Huh?
   
5. Bunnypants in Bagdad
   
6. Outage
   
7. Filthy Lucre Watch
   
8. Playing the numbers
   
9. My letter to Countdown
   
10. Jefferson's Nigerian Scams