In an interesting series of articles the Washington Post has been linking republican fund-getting (as opposed to fundraising) efforts to influence in political circles. And to think, they are just now figuring out that there may be a linkage. Gosh. Anyhow, this is kind of an interesting story...especially the part where it only cost the dude "zillionaire chump-change" to make millions more and keep environmental groups from getting a say in the process.
Richard T. Farmer is one of America's richest men and a Bush Pioneer by virtue of having raised at least $100,000 for the 2000 campaign. Over the past 15 years, he and his wife have given $3.1 million to Bush campaigns, the Republican Party and Republican candidates.
Farmer's family controls Cintas Corp., a $2.7 billion company that rents and launders uniforms and industrial shop towels. For years, Farmer's industry has been at odds with the Environmental Protection Agency over increased regulation of shop towels, particularly a Clinton administration proposal that, though not fatal, "would have cost us a lot of money," Farmer said.
In a recent interview at company headquarters here, Farmer said his campaign donations were made with no strings attached. He said he supports Republicans because they believe in "less government, more individual freedom, more individual responsibility.
More "individual responsibility"? Really? Where? Certainly not with the 1600 Crew... they blame everyone else for everything. Continuing on...
After a series of telephone calls, e-mails, letters and meetings with representatives of the laundry industry, the EPA had provided industrial-laundry lobbyists with an advance copy of a portion of the proposed rule, which the lobbyists edited and the agency adopted.
That same opportunity was not given to the rule's opponents -- environmental groups, a labor union, hazardous-waste landfill operators and paper towel manufacturers who argue their product should be treated as environmentally equal to laundered towels.
...
In May, Whitman sent a conciliatory response: "Partnerships with our stakeholders will be an important part of how we will do business at EPA."
To aid in the effort, the industry urged contributions to its Textile Rental Services Association's Political Action Committee. "Will PAC donations open doors, get appointments and allow your message to be delivered? Absolutely," Textile Rental magazine said in its March 2002 edition.
...
Farmer said he never contacted the administration about the new rule. He said he did complain about the rule to Ohio Republican Sen. George V. Voinovich and Rep. Rob Portman, a fellow Bush Pioneer and chairman of Bush's campaign in Ohio this year.
Farmer said he made the calls in 2002 on behalf of the two laundry trade groups.
...
About the same time in 2002 that Farmer was making his calls and the trade groups were contacting members of Congress, he made a major contribution. On March 19, 2002, Farmer gave $250,000 to the National Republican Congressional Committee.
At issue is whether or not companies who process and launder woven cloth towels have to wring them out to remove chemical solvents which could get into the groundwater supply (hence drinking water) eventually in the course of being laundered. Farmer and Cintas are anti-wringing because of the costs involved, their prime adversaries; environmental groups and the paper-towel industry...so check this final result out...
Also, the EPA opted not to require the towels to be wrung out. "The point of that is not to make it harder to do than what you would do through your normal course of business," Dellinger said.
However, he told the group, the paper towel industry would have to wring out its towels to make sure they had no more than five grams of solvent on them before being dumped.
No objection here to making sure paper towels are relatively solvent-free before going to the landfill; but what a win for the cloth-towel folks...screw all your opponents with the right donations.
If Mr. Farmer and all the other big donors honestly think that the American people believe that money can't buy influence, then either they are under the impression that we are really stupid or ....[fill in the blank]
jeebus.
posted by Jo Fish on 05.16.04 at 11:57 PM
Comments:
Wring out the turkee juice before you toss that rag...
posted by: Mr.Murder on 05.17.04 at 09:47 PM [permalink]