July 01, 2004


The Mess in Mesopotamia

And it is. It always was. Until there's either an asteroid hitting the earth or a volcano in Baghdad it always will be. The Brits learned it the hard way back in the early 20th Century as their Empire was imploding, and well, we're just breaking that code now. Not like there aren't history books or anything...not like fearless leader wasn't a (what?) major (besides Drunken Stupor) at Yale. Well, I guess that the PNAC Neocons were a lot smarter than those stupid ol' Brits, eh?

After a particularly brutal day of bombings in Baghdad an Iraqi friend recently asked, "Are the Americans so smart that they have a plan for Iraq that's so complicated that I don't understand it, or are they so stupid that they have no plan at all?"
Well, that pretty much provides a summation of the 1600 Crew ... candy and rose petals aside.
Over the past year, the CPA consistently relied on the guidance of westernized Iraqis who share (or at least say they do) the American vision for a free, democratic, pluralistic, secular (although this is rarely mentioned) Iraq.

The CPA was in effect talking to itself. ...
...
On Monday, the United States handed the reigns of power to a little-known Iraqi exile with credentials that fit the American vision for Iraq: Ayad Allawi, a British educated, secular Shiite whom the CIA once considered an "asset."

Let's see, Preznit Wannabe A. Diktator and his pet poodle have already said that it's okey-doke with them if Allawi declares martial law. Now, really, how many US-installed rulers can you name who have given up power voluntarily? You're only allowed to use one hand and this is not a trick question...

My bet, Allawi is still there, we have more troops for 'security' and it's a freaking mess no matter who wins in November. History does indeed repeat itself...and we're getting to learn that

again

and again

and again.

posted by Jo Fish on 07.01.04 at 06:21 PM





Comments:

Soon as Allawi took over assasssinationsa went haywire. Saddam is polling better than Bush there watch them off his ass since he is a Rummy fingerpointer.

It is funny Chalabi is letting him have a say, knowing he is done for and that his words will get Bush out of Iraq and allow him to try and take over.

Iran/Iraq/Arabia is his plan, each has Shi'ia in it. Bush played right into his hand.

posted by: Mr.Murder on 07.02.04 at 03:07 AM [permalink]



Slightly OT:
A perceptive writer on one of the blogs pointed out the classic case of the Dog That Didn't Bark: The (non)reporting in today's NYT about how little info has come out of Saddam since he's been captured.

The point skimmed over in the article -- apparently Saddam has consistently been telling his interrogators that: a) No, I didn't have any WMD,and; 2) No, there is no connect between me and OBL, I couldn't pick the dude out of a lineup.

It's a safe bet that if he'd been waterboarded into giving a "Yes" response to either one of those questions, we'd have been hearing about it from every Dear Leader/RNC/wingnut operation out there 24/7 in the Fair, Balanced and Unafraid manner so characteristic of those outlets.

This is a point that hopefully our side of Upper Blogistan will start hammering on until the SCLM is shamed into saying something about it.

posted by: fbg46 on 07.02.04 at 01:56 PM [permalink]






Post a Comment:

Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember your info?



















usdemvet -at- hotmail.com
or
usndemvet -at- usdemvet.com (coming soon)






All the original material © 2002-2003 Jo Fish
steal what you want, all I ask is an attribution of some sort
Thanks