September 08, 2004


Where were you in '72, Mr. Preznit?

I love this. It made my day.

Over the next three years, he logged 326.4 hours as a pilot and an additional 9.9 hours as a co-pilot, mostly in his the F-102A jet used to intercept enemy aircraft. Of the 278 hours he flew in the interceptor, about 77 hours were in the TF-102A, the two-seat trainer version of the one-seat fighter jet.
...
A six-month historical record of his 147th Fighter Interceptor Group, also turned over to the AP on Tuesday, shows some of the training Bush missed with his colleagues during that time.

Significantly, it showed the unit joined a "24-hour active alert mission to safeguard against surprise attack" in the southern United State beginning on Oct. 6, 1972, a time when Bush did not report for duty, according to his pay records. emphasis added

Bush's lone service in October was outside Texas, presumably with an Alabama unit he had permission to train with in September, October and November 1972.

As part of the mission, the 147th kept two F-102a jets - the same Bush flew before he was grounded - on ready alert to be launched within five minutes' warning.

Standing the Alert? Why that's somebody elses problem. After all, why not take as much time off as possible, even to the point of derelection of duty? It seems to be a life-lesson and a habit. Preznit No Show had always gotten away with it before, what made 2001 any different in terms of a life most wasted?

If this does not point out the difference between a guy who shows and goes and a cowardly fratboy who just couldn't be bothered, I don't know what does. During the Cold War those exercises were taken with immense gravity by the aircrews who participated, because the Soviets had aircraft that could reach our shores and target our country. Many folks don't realize how often the Soviet Bears flew up and down both coasts on "patrols", armed and ready to go. Units like the 147th stood lonely, nessescary vigils as did many others against that threat. Apparently threats to this country have never been of any real concern to one George W. Bush, unless there's something in it for him, and his "friends".

Update: Kristof has a bit of an epiphany about the Preznit's military service, but concludes his column with this:

Does this disqualify Mr. Bush from being commander in chief? No. ...
What Kristof misses, and I suspect it's because of his lack of military service, is that all these things, especially Bush's inability to perform his duties, shirking responsibility and un-officer-like behavior are as we used to say prejudicial to good order and discipline. How can you ask a PFC to do something you won't do, like show up for combat in the service of your Country? You can't. Period.

Kristof also has a link to an excellent analysis of Preznit Deserting Wastrel's service record by a retired Army COL, who spares no details.

posted by Jo Fish on 09.08.04 at 09:52 AM





Comments:

when you have jesus, you have the great american voting public. they don't care about viet nam. they hate atheists. kerry, to them, is an atheist. it appears hopeless.

posted by: tim on 09.08.04 at 12:09 PM [permalink]



As he did in '72 he did in '01. No difference, except the whole nation was watching in '01 when he disappeared for most of the day and then addressed a frightened nation by videotape from a safe undisclosed bunker somewhere. Wish he had stayed there.

posted by: carson on 09.08.04 at 12:57 PM [permalink]



Jo, do you have a working link for that “more sinister” explanation for ARPC’s failure to hold Bush to the fire over his shirking of duty post Alabama? Is he alluding to that link you posted a couple of weeks back, dense in paperwork excerpts, that showed that, without saying as much, the ARPC was clearly considering Bush a deserter when they couldn't get in touch with him at HBS, and that the discharge date and change of MOS to Executive Support were probably put in after the fact by someone at ARPC to cover Bush's ass?

This is a wonderful document but it illustrates precisely the problem with making an issue of this: with 184 footnotes in 34 pages and heavy in military jargon, it requires a graduate degree in the bureaucratic arcana of military personnel practices to really follow (we barely could). The Bush campaign knows damn well that many things in W’s records can easily be taken out of context to make him look good.

Hopefully, tonight’s 60 Minutes II will have solved that problem.

posted by: SullyWatch on 09.08.04 at 01:49 PM [permalink]



What I don't understand as a veteran is how many of the vets are supportive of Bush when it is clear from Shrub's record that he was a dirtbag even by standards for enlisted soldiers much less officers.

There is simply no excuse for missing a drill other than a family emergency or serious illness, let alone missing a required physical that impacts a unit's readiness.

posted by: WyldPirate on 09.08.04 at 01:50 PM [permalink]



The only difference between '72 and '01 is that in '72, he had 'buddies' covering his ass and doing his duty for him while he took time off and partied in Birmingham. In '01, there was no one to cover for the little shirker.

posted by: Snow on 09.08.04 at 02:38 PM [permalink]



"In '01, there was no one to cover for the little shirker."

Um ... the "liberal media" have done yeoman work to cover for the little shirker for almost three years now. Don't they deserve a bit of recognition?

posted by: on 09.08.04 at 06:44 PM [permalink]



The "24-hour active alert" of Oct. 6, 1972, coincided with the Yom Kippur War -- the last time, to my knowledge, we increased DEFCONS. I know we were flushing F-4s from our active inventory to the Israelis (where they would reconfigure them). We needed fighter-interceptors to pick up missions during that critical period.

posted by: WTC Survivor on 09.08.04 at 06:45 PM [permalink]






Post a Comment:

Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember your info?



















usdemvet -at- hotmail.com
or
usndemvet -at- usdemvet.com (coming soon)






All the original material © 2002-2003 Jo Fish
steal what you want, all I ask is an attribution of some sort
Thanks