March 22, 2005


The Schindlers and the Wingnut Talking Points

A rare event for me, watching WingNutTV...because of the events of the weekend and the Federal Court hearing in the Schiavo case it was an interesting way to see the events unfold from the wingnutteriest POV. Of course there was no mention of the 1999 legislation that Preznit Gassed'n'Ready signed, the No Hospital Fund Left Behind Act, to ensure that hospitals could (and do) turn off life support for the Sun Hudson's of Texas. Of course they can't mention that before little Scotty gets to spin it.

So, what is SchindlerSpin? It's Pat Robertson's pet JD4Jeebus, Jay Sekulow saying this on a Newshour broadcast:

JAY SEKULOW: They have done it; not in the context of a life-and-death decision like this, but they have had special legislation. You heard about them; Professor Tribe just talked about them in the context of there's been legislation passed on economic issues that affect one company or a series of companies within a sphere.
This is a core wingnut talking point; "legislation passed on ... issues that affect one company or series of companies within a sphere"? Whatever could the learned Mr. Sekulow be talking about?
Private laws: Affect an individual, family, or small group. Private laws are enacted to assist citizens that have been injured by government programs or who are appealing an executive agency ruling such as deportation. Private laws citations include the abbreviation, Pvt.L., the Congress number (e.g. 107), and the number of the law. For example: Pvt.L. 107-006.
Note the difference here? Private laws "are enacted to assist citizens that have been injured by government programs or who are appealing an executive agency ruling such as deportation." Specifically not to overturn a judicial ruling that's been through an entire court system in a state government and then up to the Supreme Court once. The christo-fascists including Sekulow must have skipped that day in civics class where they talked about the separation of powers. Small Detail, Trivial really in the 10,000 year history of the earth, I guess.

The Wingnuts are trying to distort this by using words and phrases like Private Bills to conflate and confuse the meaning of the law. Base emotional appeals coupled with misleading rhetoric and (a fanatical devotion to the pope) are their best weapons.

We have to keep bringing the facts to bear, relentlessly until this issue is one that becomes a "good political issue" for us against the wingnuts. After all, how do they run for reelection on a platform of dismantaling the Constitution if we don't let them?

posted by Jo Fish on 03.22.05 at 09:42 PM





Comments:

Base emotional appeals coupled with misleading rhetoric and (a fanatical devotion to the pope) are their best weapons.

Don't underestimate fear, surprise, and ruthless efficiency, either.

posted by: Andy Axel on 03.23.05 at 12:07 AM [permalink]



The theocratic right and their supporters in Congress will use this issue to attack "activist judges." This is all part of the Bush/GOP Kulturkampf to establish a judiciary that will blur and ultimately eliminate the line between church and state.
It's so sad--and hypocritical--that this poor woman's tragedy is being used in this manner.

posted by: Nick on 03.23.05 at 08:05 AM [permalink]



Neocons efficient? Ruthless for sure, but effeciency isn't high on their list of priority.

posted by: Mr. Murder on 03.23.05 at 10:40 AM [permalink]



Recipe for reconciliation: The mother, father and siblings should take hospice training and volunteer 15 hours per week-end in a hospice facility. They will learn that this is not their unique territory and they are belittling the rest of us that have had to deal with this issue, i.e. death with dignity, or your description of choice.

Countless citizens have been down this path, why doesn't Congress understand this, why let an individual case become a cause d'celebre? For political framing purposes of course, can't you just visualize how many times we are going to have that "culture of life slogan" thrown around the msm from now until 2009? And the height of political hypocrisy is none other than Tom DeLay espousing on moral decisions, whew!!!

m l cadrecha

posted by: meri cadrecha on 03.26.05 at 04:04 PM [permalink]






Post a Comment:

Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember your info?



















usdemvet -at- hotmail.com
or
usndemvet -at- usdemvet.com (coming soon)






All the original material © 2002-2003 Jo Fish
steal what you want, all I ask is an attribution of some sort
Thanks