July 13, 2005


Tick Tick, Drip Drip

A Tom Delay associate has lost a bid to make an indictment go away in Texas.

A Texas state judge yesterday reaffirmed the indictment of a political associate of House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Tex.), turning aside his claim that a state law barring the use of corporate funds in the 2002 Texas election was unconstitutionally vague.
...
n September 2004, a grand jury indicted John Colyandro, who directed the Texas group, on charges of illegally collecting the money. Colyandro, a veteran of White House political adviser Karl Rove's direct-mail firm, had sought to have the indictment dismissed on grounds that the law was poorly drafted and infringed on protected rights.

District Judge Robert Perkins, ruling in Austin, denied the motion, clearing an obstacle to Colyandro's eventual trial after appeals are heard. In remarks from the bench, he indicated he plans to dismiss next month a similar motion by Jim Ellis, the Texas group's chief fundraiser, who was indicted for money-laundering in the case.
...
DeLay, who has not been charged with wrongdoing in the case, served on the board of the Texas group, and called or met with some of its corporate donors. He also wrote a cover letter for its fundraising brochure. Ellis still runs DeLay's federal political action committee, Americans for a Republican Majority, which served as a model for the Texas group.emphasis added

How long before one of the folks involved in these organizations rolls over on Delay? I doubt very much Delay would go to the mat for either of them, or anyone else at a trial. Who knows, if they can give up Delay and walk, wouldn't that be a pretty attractive option?

posted by Jo Fish on 07.13.05 at 12:24 PM





Comments:

Right now, at least the American people understand that an indictment means you gotta go... not merely out of your leadership position, but OUT. Similarly, if Rove is indicted-- for ANYTHING-- he has to go.

The question is who will go first: will they have deLay be indicted first and HANG ON to set a precedent that not even INDICTMENTS can force Republicans to step down because the rules such as we know them apply to high ranking Republicans?

This could be fascinating...

posted by: the talking dog on 07.15.05 at 08:23 PM [permalink]






Post a Comment:

Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember your info?



















usdemvet -at- hotmail.com
or
usndemvet -at- usdemvet.com (coming soon)






All the original material © 2002-2003 Jo Fish
steal what you want, all I ask is an attribution of some sort
Thanks