July 19, 2005


Justice French Fry

So Beloved Leader has nominated hisself a Soopreme Kort Justice. Beloved Leader's nominee is relatively colorless 50 year-old white guy with suitably conservative leanings (Federalist Society, clerked for Rehnquist, worked in Ken Starr's office) to suit the wingnuts. He has apparently written some on Roe v. Wade, although not much. He's got no track record really, which is a plus for Bunnypants and the Christo-Fascists, but since he was put on the DC Court of Appeals joined the majority on a ruling about a 12 year-old girl who was arrested and dragged away in handcuffs for eating one french fry aboard a DC Metro train. One French Fry. People, this is a guy who hates anyone's civil rights, the constitution and will be down-the-line supporter of the 1600 Crew's planned descent into fascism. While working in Bush I's solicitor general's office, Roberts wrote:

"We continue to believe that [Roe v. Wade] was wrongly decided and should be overruled. ... the Court's conclusions in Roe that there is a fundamental right to an abortion and that government has no compelling interest in protecting prenatal human life throughout pregnancy find no support in the text, structure, or history of the Constitution." ...
So there's that. The republicans will try and spin that as he was just writing it to satisfy his masters at the Solicitor General's office, which is a bullshit argument, because if they believed any differently he would have been writing briefs on how best to nail criminals committing actual crimes, see: Iran-Contra and violations of the Boland Amendment. So what about the French Fry? Glad you asked...
For a unanimous panel, denied the weak civil rights claims of a 12-year-old girl who was arrested and handcuffed in a Washington, D.C., Metro station for eating a French fry. Roberts noted that "no one is very happy about the events that led to this litigation" and that the Metro authority had changed the policy that led to her arrest. (Hedgepeth v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 2004).
So, when the full force of a wrongheaded government policy falls on a 12 year-old girl, Roberts sides with the bad policy. Note that Metro changed its' policy.

Other wonderful Roberts moments which are sure signs that we'll all be cherishing our pre-Orwellian Fascist Golden Years that were...he disagrees with the Endangered Species Act, says Congress can't make inconvenient rules. Also doesn't particularly care for Affirmative Action (he and Clarence will do so well together there). Other fun facts, he's written amicus briefs on behalf of Operation Rescue, and finally he really dislikes the disabled.

Lead counsel for Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Ky, Inc. v. Williams. The case involved a woman who was fired after asking Toyota for accommodations to do her job after being diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome. The court ruled that while this condition impaired her ability to work, it did not impair her ability to perform major life activities. Disability rights groups fear that this decision may erode the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Look for Justice French Fry to rule in cases where Veterans coming back from Iraq who try and make claims against the government or VA for inadequate care or other matters to be summarily rebuffed. Roberts is a company man, for the company that offers the most. And right now, that's his Federalist Society pals.

If we tag him with "Justice French Fry" that might get even some myopic Americans to say "whaaat?" and perhaps generate interest in keeping this guy off the court.

posted by Jo Fish on 07.19.05 at 10:29 PM





Comments:

You have to understand the Metro rules on food on the Metro, though. Look at NYC with rats and other vermin everywhere. That's what Metro was hoping to avoid with the no-food rule.

Bravo to the Judge for not second-guessing the people's ability to make laws for themselves without having judges always second-guessing them. The people (through their reps) came to see the law as too draconian and decided to change it. That, people, is the way our government is supposed to work, not having judges substituting their judgment for the people's unless an action clearly violates the Constitution. A rule about food on the Metro does not violate the Constitution.

posted by: not bubba on 07.20.05 at 01:01 AM [permalink]



"which is a plus for Bunnypants and the Christo-Fascists"---

I see hatred is alive and well in your heart.

posted by: Jim on 07.20.05 at 01:25 AM [permalink]



"A rule about food on the Metro does not violate the Constitution."

Indeed, but can we agree that the actions of the Metro Police (?) regarding the 12 year old was way, way, way over the top and totally lacking in reason and common sense?

In any event, unless Roberts has a dark side that hasn't surfaced and his being a conservative is not what I mean, he will be confirmed and, I suspect, quite easily.

I doubt he is a harpy like Thomas or a rabid idealogue like Scalia.

Time will tell.


posted by: bobski on 07.20.05 at 09:19 AM [permalink]



And eating one french fry does violate the Constitution?

posted by: Stef on 07.20.05 at 04:57 PM [permalink]



We need a Supreme Court justice that reflects the Democrat way. Someone who can commune with Eleanor; determine what the Constitution says by reading Ryussian law; do the bidding of NAMBLA and MoveOn; insure that Seattle election methods are spread far and wide; continue the Leftist tradition of trampling on the Constitution by eliminating the rest of the Bill of Rights now that its killed the 5th. No doubt that the dhimmicrats will nominate Bin Laden when they get the chance.

posted by: TJ Jackson on 07.20.05 at 09:49 PM [permalink]



Well, I can't quite determine if the last comment was supposed to be a joke or not. I mean, it's purely insane, but I've met people who tend to think in such abusive ways, so I'll reserve judgement on the poster. (I'd like to believe it's a joke though) If it isn't, well, there's an easy way for the Republicans to thwart the democrats 'plans' *cough* to nominate Bin Laden. They could, you know, capture him. You know, like we should have been doing instead of invading another country, hmm? I think Bin Laden hs breathed the air of freedom far too long. But hey, what do i know?

posted by: Erik D on 07.21.05 at 07:39 AM [permalink]



Toyata, say Cheney's former staffer is their head of marketing.

Small world eh?

His wifey is a contractor for Iraq.
"Yet another first for our boundary-breaching White House: for the first time in American history, we’re going to have a justice on the high court whose spouse facilitates financing and putting together global satellite systems."

"Also, the company in which she is a partner, Shaw Pittman, emphasizes among other things its expertise in facilitating business in Iraq"

posted by: Mr.Murder on 07.21.05 at 08:51 AM [permalink]



...also, suppose he sides with employers vs. guard/reserves compensation and job retention?


He has ruled against plaintiffs in civil suits consistently, one of the anti-torts.

posted by: Mr.Murder on 07.21.05 at 08:56 AM [permalink]






Post a Comment:

Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember your info?



















usdemvet -at- hotmail.com
or
usndemvet -at- usdemvet.com (coming soon)






All the original material © 2002-2003 Jo Fish
steal what you want, all I ask is an attribution of some sort
Thanks