September 28, 2005


Yeeeah. OOOkay.

Man, sometimes you just wait for the stories to write themselves. Seems that Michael "Not Me!" Brown somehow managed to sign a deal for $236 million in cruise ship space on three Carnival ships for six months.

On Sept. 1, as tens of thousands of desperate Louisianans packed the New Orleans Superdome and convention center, the Federal Emergency Management Agency pleaded with the U.S. Military Sealift Command: The government needed 10,000 berths on full-service cruise ships, FEMA said, and it needed the deal done by noon the next day.

The hasty appeal yielded one of the most controversial contracts of the Hurricane Katrina relief operation, a $236 million agreement with Carnival Cruise Lines for three ships that now bob more than half empty in the Mississippi River and Mobile Bay. The six-month contract -- staunchly defended by Carnival but castigated by politicians from both parties -- has come to exemplify the cost of haste that followed Katrina's strike and FEMA's lack of preparation.

So there's the bad managment and Prior Planning Prevents Piss Poor Performance thing. But hey...check this out:
Coburn and Obama disagreed. "Finding out after the fact that we're spending taxpayer money on no-bid contracts and sweetheart deals for cruise lines is no way to run a recovery effort," they said in the statement.
That would be Tom Coburn, the knuckleheaded republican junior senator from Oklahoma. I wonder if anyone has ever mentioned the name "Halliburton" to him?

Gee, sometimes those damned facts are just so inconvenient and shit, aren't they?

posted by Jo Fish on 09.28.05 at 01:59 AM





Comments:

Yeah. Real inconvenient. If America hasn't realized yet that this neocon Republican government is running us into the dirt, I hope it's waking up.

Jeff

posted by: Jeff Huber on 09.28.05 at 08:55 AM [permalink]



The funniest part about the deal is that they made them close the casinos on the ships.

posted by: John Gillnitz on 09.28.05 at 11:48 AM [permalink]



I'm becomeing very concerned about Obama's loyalities or possibly his real political leanings. He seems to vote more for Republican issues when I see his name in print than Democrat issues. What's up with that? Is the new kid on the block a plant? It wouldn't surprise me in the least.

posted by: Sharon on 09.29.05 at 10:36 AM [permalink]






Post a Comment:

Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember your info?



















usdemvet -at- hotmail.com
or
usndemvet -at- usdemvet.com (coming soon)






All the original material © 2002-2003 Jo Fish
steal what you want, all I ask is an attribution of some sort
Thanks