I guess that the less-is-more, war-is-peace crew residing at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and up on Capitol Hill have decided that well, if you can't lie well, then just lie. Here's Medicare and other entitlement reform:
The House yesterday narrowly approved a contentious budget-cutting package that would save nearly $40 billion over five years by imposing substantial changes on programs including Medicaid, welfare, child support and student lending.
With its presidential signature all but assured, the bill represents the first effort in nearly a decade to try to slow the growth of entitlement programs, one that will be felt by millions of Americans. Women on welfare are likely to face longer hours of work, education or community service to qualify for their checks. Recipients of Medicaid can expect to face higher co-payments and deductibles, especially on expensive prescription drugs and emergency room visits for non-emergency care. More affluent seniors will find it far more difficult to qualify for Medicaid-covered nursing care.
College students could face higher interest rates when their banks get squeezed by the federal government. ... State-led efforts to force deadbeat parents to pay their child support may also have to be curtailed.
Yesterday's 216 to 214 vote, largely along party lines, gave a much-needed boost to President Bush, who is trying to reassert his control over domestic policy despite a series of legislative setbacks and near-record-low approval ratings.
I'm not sure what metric the Post is using to show that Preznit Plutonian Polls is getting a lift from by the passage of this legislation, maybe they just overheard Ken Mehlman remarking about that as he was sucking down Vienna Sausages at a media-only social.
The impact of the bill on the deficit is likely to be negligible, slicing less than one-half of 1 percent from the estimated $14.3 trillion in federal spending over the next five years.
...
"I do not know how anyone can say with a straight face that when we voted to cut spending in December to help achieve deficit reductions, we can now turn around a short while later to provide tax cuts that exceed or cancel out the reduction in spending," Sen. George V. Voinovich (R-Ohio) said yesterday, as the Senate took up a procedural motion that would allow tax-cut negotiations to begin. "We cannot afford these tax cuts."
What's this? A GOoPer not cheering as the 1600 Crew flushes our economic future down the tubes? Voinovich is now officially-as-hell off the 1600 Crew Holiday Card list for 2006.
When the bills for all this come due, it's going to be interesting to see how many people you meet will actually admit to having voted for these idiots. Because shame is transferrable, and no one wants to admit they could have been this stupid, residents of the The Corner excepted.
posted by Jo Fish on 02.02.06 at 06:29 PM
Comments:
Keep your hands off the tax cuts--our Dear and Fearless and Fiscally Responsible Leader wants to make them permanent.
posted by: Nina on 02.04.06 at 01:29 PM [permalink]
Now the tax cuts are NOT meant to downsize government, only the programs supported by liberals (such as federally managed wildlands, social programs for the poor, EPA, Superfund [too late], the arts, reality-based science, etc.). The neocons intend to create a big enough burden to justify cutting these programs. That's their idea of a smaller government. It's the "To hell with you, I got mine" vision of a society. Programs that support big business (known as corporate welfare) and the miltary-industrial complex will get all the funding they want (more if the neocons can get away with it).