Thursday, May 31, 2007

The Disgrace

Yeah, this pretty much smacks of the total disrespect that the 1600 Crew has for the men and women of the Armed Forces. A real leader would take umbrage at the thought of this happening. Not our Boy King. He's the Commander Guy after all.

So the brass at every level from the Pentagram on down should be ashamed that this even happened.

So many Fort Lewis soldiers are being killed in Iraq the Army base will no longer hold individual memorial services.

Starting next month Fort Lewis says it will hold one memorial a month for all the dead soldiers.

What else do you need to know. Whether you agree with my politics or not, you have to be ashamed that this even happened.

And if they have some limp-dick excuse about being "too hard" well fuck them. I don't think it was particularly easy to face a trip to Iraq, and come home wearing a "transfer tube" instead of a uniform.

Support our Troops, except well, when they're dead and can't be speak for themselves. The 1600 Crew way.

posted by Jo Fish at 10:51 PM | Comments (0)



These Sick Bastards, These Sick Days

It's getting worse and worse in BushAmerica, aka Fascist Land. A Marine who used his Constitutional Rights to speak out and essentially petition his government for redress of his greivances (i.e. Mess O'Potamia) is being persecuted in the form of a petty prosecution solely to be made an example of.

An Iraq war veteran could lose his honorable discharge status after being photographed wearing fatigues at an anti-war protest.

Marine Cpl. Adam Kokesh and other veterans marked the fourth anniversary of the war in Iraq in March by wearing their uniforms - with military insignia removed - and roaming around the nation's capital on a mock patrol.

After Kokesh was identified in a photo cutline in The Washington Post, a superior officer sent him a letter saying he might have violated a rule prohibiting troops from wearing uniforms without authorization.

Kokesh, a member of Iraq Veterans Against the War, responded with an obscenity.

Yeah, like what... "Fuck off" perhaps?
Now, a military panel has been scheduled to meet with Kokesh on Monday to decide whether his discharge status should be changed from "honorable" to "other than honorable."

"This is clearly a case of selective prosecution and intimidation of veterans who speak out against the war," Kokesh said. "To suggest that while as a veteran you don't have freedom of speech is absurd."
...
Kokesh argues that he was not representing the military at the protest in Washington, and he made that clear by removing his name tag and other military insignia from his uniform.

Lebowitz said Kokesh technically is a civilian unless recalled to active duty and had the right to be disrespectful in his response to the officer. He called the proceedings against Kokesh highly unusual and said the military usually seeks to change a veteran's discharge status only if a crime has been committed.

If his discharge status is changed, Kokesh said he could lose some health benefits and be forced to repay about $10,800 he received to obtain his undergraduate degree on the GI Bill.

Not being a lawyer I don't quite know what the real intricacies of this case are, but I have to suspect that it's not got much of a shelf life. I don't know what authority they have to return this young man to active duty when his absolute EAOS is June 18th to prosecute him. It was always my understanding that you could not keep someone on active duty solely to convene a courts-martial, and if they are talking admin board (which it sounds like) then they would, I think have to go through and Article 15 hearing (Mast/Office Hours) and he'd have the right to demand a courts martial at that point.

I suspect that the shit would summarily hit the fan then. Big time.

Yet another example of how the 1600 Crew "supports our troops" (oh, and our freedoms).

Interestingly, he might have found an unique way to avoid a return trip to the sandbox...

He was supposed to go to Iraq a second time, but was demoted from sergeant to corporal and not allowed to return after it was learned that he brought a pistol back after his first tour in 2004.
Now isn't that interesting. Doesn't Preznit Chest Thumper have a set of Saddam's pistoles in his office? Good for the Goose...yadda yadda yadda....

I guess if you brought home an RPG you'd probably not be allowed to go back either, and I'm sure the NRA would fight to the death for your right to keep it.

posted by Jo Fish at 10:06 PM | Comments (0)



Monday, May 28, 2007

Memorial Day

We still have, unfortunately, new reasons to commemorate the fallen because they are still, well, dying.

Thanks a lot you two draft-dodging sons-of-bitches and your enablers. None of the men and women killed will have a chance to grow old and filthy rich like Five-deferment Dick or become President. Instead they get to die in some shit-hole country caught in a millenia-old civil war that will certainly not be ended this year or next or even a decade or more from now.

And to think, they have you two to thank for that.

posted by Jo Fish at 09:50 AM | Comments (0)



Sunday, May 27, 2007

Always been a bad idea, now it's worse

The "contractors" in Iraq were born out of the Rumsfeldian/Norquistian drive to privatize the military and just about every other aspect of the Federal government. After all, "security contractors" who were in country could not be counted as troops, fill jobs (up to and including, no shit, MEDEVAC) that were normally done by organic assets of a fighting force (supply, medicine, REMF functionality). Contracts (and contractors) meant rewarding political supporters, as well as keeping the heat off of the 1600 Crew for ramping up troop levels (well, until the surge).

The Contractors in Iraq started as an unstructured, unaccountable force that just sort of appeared in response to what Rumsfeld seemed to want as a step in his "force transformation" strategery. They filled a need that he created for a quasi-soldier, but with no accountability to anyone but their mercenary bosses sitting back in the US or whereever. Until Fallujah, the contractors were pretty low key as far as everyone was concerned. More attention was paid to the no-bid contracts that CheneyBurton/KBR received for providing, than what was going on the streets of Baghdad with the armed security "contractors". Then came Fallujah, and the response by Mr. "I listen to my Commanders in the Field", who pretty much told Bunnypants that going into Fallujah on a Revenge Mission was a bad idea, with a capital "B".

So now, four-plus years into Mess O'Potamia we find ourselves (and I think it's really us saddled with the consequences of the actions of the "contractors". We've moved beyond Kos' "Fuck the Mercenaries" moment to a point where some examination of these extra-national (for want of a better word) contractors operate, and whether or not we want them representing our country within Iraq (and anywhere else they operate on our behalf).

Employees of Blackwater USA, a private security firm under contract to the State Department, opened fire on the streets of Baghdad twice in two days last week, and one of the incidents provoked a standoff between the security contractors and Iraqi forces, U.S. and Iraqi officials said.

A Blackwater guard shot and killed an Iraqi driver Thursday near the Interior Ministry, according to three U.S. officials and one Iraqi official who were briefed on the incident but spoke on condition of anonymity because of a pending investigation. On Wednesday, a Blackwater-protected convoy was ambushed in downtown Baghdad, triggering a furious battle in which the security contractors, U.S. and Iraqi troops and AH-64 Apache attack helicopters were firing in a congested area.

Yeah, see? That raises some rather sharp questions to my mind, not the least of which is why if these are ostensibly "private" contractors they are getting air support in the form of AH-64s, and couldn't (and shouldn't) that air support be reserved exclusively for our troops and not the employees of large campaign contributors?
Blackwater USA was co-founded by former Navy Seal Erik Prince, a "billionaire right-wing fundamentalist Christian from a powerful Michigan Republican family. A major Republican campaign contributor, he interned in the White House of President George H.W. Bush and campaigned for Pat Buchanan in 1992. He founded the mercenary firm Blackwater USA in 1997 with Gary Jackson, another former Navy SEAL."
...
Erik Prince, Blackwater's founder, is a former SEAL who is deeply involved in Republican Party politics. Since 1998, he has funneled roughly $200,000 to GOP committees and candidates, including President Bush. In 2004, Blackwater retained the Alexander Strategy Group, the PR and lobbying firm that closed down earlier this year due to its embarrassing ties to Jack Abramoff and Tom DeLay. (Paul Behrends, a former national security adviser to Congressman Dana Rohrabacher, handled the account for Alexander. After the firm shut down, Behrends moved on to a firm called C&M Capitolink, and took the Blackwater account with him.)
And Erik Prince would be...
The 37-year-old Prince is brother of Betsy DeVos, former chairwoman of the Michigan Republican Party, and brother-in-law of former GOP gubernatorial nominee Dick DeVos, R-Ada Township. Prince's Moyock, N.C.-based company has received at least $800 million in federal contracts over the past five years, according to government records.
Yeah, and let me toss another clue out there...Devos ... Amway... major republican family and ties.

Would I say that in the free market a Blackwater has no place? No. But as a shadow, and unaccountable instrument of foreign policy I'd say there is absolutely no place for a Blackwater when the mission of the State Department (with whom Blackwater has a 100-plus million dollar "security" contract in Iraq) to function without absolute and transparent accountability.

Perhaps a place for the spineless Democrats to start is by building some rules for the accountability of these contractors, and limiting what they can and can't do, and what resources they are allowed to use in the field. I don't see that my tax dollars are especially well-spent providing air support to a group of folks who have no accountability for the actions that might cause them to need said air support in the first place.

A service person getting stationed anywhere in the world is told that they are a "representative" of the US. I don't know why we allow contractors to go overseas on our dime without an understanding that they face both responsibility and accountability for their actions if not from the US government, then the government of the host country. I have to suspect that such an understanding would result in better if not more rational behavior.

posted by Jo Fish at 10:18 AM | Comments (0)



Saturday, May 26, 2007

From the Evil Elf Queen's testimony...

When the Evil Elf Goodling of Regent went up to testify last week, there were lots of humorous (in an ironical way, not Chris Rock/Robin Williams way) moments. Like her revelation that her stint as Student Council president qualified her to hire and fire men and women charged with enforcing the laws of the land. But by far one of the best moments came here:

SENSENBRENNER:Now, let me say that this committee has spent $250,000 of the taxpayers' money basically investigating the replacement of U.S. attorneys whose terms had expired.

I was the chairman of this committee for six years during the Bush administration and the chairman of the Science Committee for four years during the Clinton administration.I never signed a subpoena, because I didn't have to.And I never asked my committee to request the Justice Department to obtain a grant of immunity to anybody.

It seems to me that with this fishing expedition, there ain't no fish in the water.And we've spent an awful lot of time and an awful lot of money finding that out.

Sensenbrenner who is one of the leading facist authoritarian cultists in the US Government (he's never met a law restricting civil liberties that he did not like) complaining that Congress had spent $250,000 on an investigation into suspected malfeasance (which by the way seems to have some substance there "Tex" [his nickname, btw]).

I'm guessing that ol' Tex has forgotten the 70 or so million dollars spent investigating the spots on Bill Clinton's dick, and if Monica was a spitter or a swallower.

So real quick (cause it's a nice Saturday afternoon, and I gotta run some errands) let's fire up the Wayback Machine and see what ol'Tex had to say about the North American Spotted Clenis:

But being a poor example isn't grounds for impeachment; undermining the rule of law is. Frustrating the court's ability to administer justice turns private misconduct into an attack upon the ability of one of the three branches of our government to impartially administer justice. This is a direct attack on the rule of law in our country and a very public wrong that goes to the constitutional workings of our government.

To me, making a false statement under oath to a criminal grand jury is an impeachable offense, period. This committee and this House decided that issue by a vote of 417 to nothing nine years ago in the Judge Nixon impeachment.

IOKIYAR, indeed. And does ol'Tex seem to think that the apparent conflicts in testimony and possible witness tampering by Abu Gonzales are much of an issue to be spoken of in the "rule of law and what do we tell the kids mode?" apparently Not So Much.

posted by Jo Fish at 02:08 PM | Comments (0)



Oh, Jeebus

I don't know what to say about stories like this anymore...

Amid sobs and waving American flags, hundreds of Maryland Army National Guard soldiers bid goodbye to family and friends yesterday and prepared to deploy to Iraq, part of the Guard's largest deployment from the state since World War II.
...
Many of them had returned from a year's deployment in Iraq as recently as May 2006.
Meanwhile, several miles away their Commander Guy bravely went on yet another vacation at Camp David where his every whim, need and want was brought to his pampered ass.

I wonder if anyone told these soldiers today that the CIA told the Preznit Happy Holidaze in January 2003 (and probably earlier) that he'd be sending everyone elses kids but not his into a meat-grinder in Iraq? Probably not. Sometimes there are just things you don't want to know.

posted by Jo Fish at 01:42 AM | Comments (0)



More Gambling at Ricks...

And I gotta tell ya, I'm just broken up about it. No, really. Oh, and there's this too....

The Justice Department considered political affiliation in screening applicants for immigration court judgeships for several years until hiring was frozen in December after objections from department lawyers, current and former officials said yesterday.

The disclosures mean that the Justice Department may have violated civil service laws, which prohibit political considerations in hiring, for as long as two years before the tenure of Monica M. Goodling, the former aide to Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales who testified about the practice this week.

So, you see Monica was really just following the established policy of politicizing the Justice Department, you don't think that a graduate of a 5th tier law school and ex-Student Council president could have come up with that on her own do you? Besides, she was too busy measuring that nekkid bimbo with the scales in the lobby of DoJ for a drape.

I'm sure that this won't be my last allusion to this, but every time I hear "Goodling" I think of some faery-tale creature from a Terry Brooks novel or something .... "The shape-shifter Goodlings waited for the Shannara brothers to come home from the pub so they could accost them as they entered the forest..." or something.

posted by Jo Fish at 01:25 AM | Comments (0)



Thursday, May 24, 2007

What Green Day said

via my good friends at Firedoglake:

MURTHA (D-PA): Supporting the bill he and Bill Young worked out. We did everything we could to work this out. Did all we could do. I feel direction change in the air. Iraqis, administration. New political diplomatic effort. Meanwhile, we have to fund the troops. They will run out of money in the next few weeks. We have to do this. Goes over some of the elements in the bill. Equipment, family housing, support for military families. Other stuff, he's rattling this off. Money for Walter Reed, etc. Short ter problem to fund military for next four months. Longer term need to work on nurse shortage, doctor shortages (do you think if we stopped these kids from getting killed, we'd help their health?). By September we can judge where we are. (Sing it with me: See You In September). The situation in Iraq will not improve, but it's necessary to wait until September anyway. This is very painful, we're making progress, we have to take what we can get. I hope everyone votes for both bills.
Jack Murtha should know better, if anyone does. He's one of the first to have called for an end to the bullshit. Why he's caving to Preznit 30% Commander Guy is beyond me.

Well, no more Rip Van Winkle...but damn, September is a long way off for another artifical benchmark/FU or whatever. Olberman is right, they've sold out. I hope he plays this everyday to remind the Democrats that we recognize their cowardice in the face of the ultra-scary 30percenter.

posted by Jo Fish at 08:25 PM | Comments (0)



Hillary and Bullshit
Is there a difference? Not from where I sit. I no more want that triangulating, self-centered bitch to be the democratic candidate than I want another four years of Preznit DimBulb (thank the Flying Spaghetti Monster that can't happen again). Why dis Hillary? Because of crap like this:
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton on Wednesday urged the Pentagon to plan quickly for the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq, yet she refused to say how she would vote on a war spending bill. ... "When I have something to say, I will say it," Clinton said. In recent statement, she has left unclear her position on when the bulk of U.S. troops should leave Iraq.
Now that's presidential style ... in the mode of the Commander Guy himself. When I have something to say, I will say it. Jeebus. How many dead soldiers does it take before she decides the poll number support a position one way or the other? Just because she's smart, well-connected, got a huge campaign war chest and thinks she deserves to be President doesn't make it so. Oh, and I have a small problem with this too: Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton ...we don't have heriditary aristocracy in this country no matter what she may think. So fuck off Hillary, go be the best Senator from New York you can be and stand for something besides running for yet another job.
posted by Jo Fish at 04:53 PM | Comments (0)



Helloooo .... Democratic "Leadership"

And I do use that term "leadership" very, very loosely...

Americans now view the war in Iraq more negatively than at any time since the war began, according to the latest New York Times/CBS News poll.
Just a thought... you all might want to fire those asshole advisors who "advise" keeping your powder dry or whatever the asinine phrase of the day is, and vote the way that 6 out of 10 people at home are probably thinking.

If you want to keep your fucking jobs that is.

That is all.

posted by Jo Fish at 04:16 PM | Comments (0)



OMG, he's still an idiot

I guess that Preznit Puddin'head didn't get any smarter in the last two months did he? (Rhetorical question). He's still making those noises that sound like words that make the faithful believe that he actually gives a shit about the "Generals" opinions. As if.

One reporter asked Mr. Bush today whether the insistence on the importance of September - a date the administration fixed in part to gain breathing space in the war debate - would have the same disadvantage as the timelines for withdrawal that Democrats had sought and Republicans had derided: giving America's enemies in Iraq a target date, or a schedule, to use their violence for maximum effect.

Mr. Bush acknowledged, a bit awkwardly, that this might be so.

"It's going to make - it could make August a tough month," he said. "What they're going to try to do is kill as many innocent people as they can, to try to influence the debate here."

But the September date was General Petraeus's idea, he said, and it was proper to defer to commanders on such matters. (my emphasis)

Because you know, not a single part of this is anything HE bears responsibility for, right?

I'm guessing that any failures (or notable lack of progress) by the mythical September deadline will be blamed on (1)The Democrats (2) the "War Czar" (3) General Petraeus and/or (4) al-Maliki. Mix and match the order at your pleasure, because none of the blame will land with the idiot bastard son of a bitch in Oval Office.

posted by Jo Fish at 04:09 PM | Comments (0)



60 Days

Hi. I'm back again. Mental health days, doncha know? Glad to be back in the saddle. New job, new hours, new way of looking at life. Back in the cockpit again, which is nice. Less money, but more fun.

How can anyone hate that? Thanks for hanging around while I've been off "skying out".

Now back to the corruption at hand. It's a virtual fucking smorgasbord of malfeasance out there, isn't it?

posted by Jo Fish at 04:05 PM | Comments (0)



















usdemvet -at- hotmail.com
or
usndemvet -at- usdemvet.com (coming soon)






All the original material © 2002-2003 Jo Fish
steal what you want, all I ask is an attribution of some sort
Thanks